The relationship between retail banking customers and their financial institutions can often be described as strained and tumultuous. The role played by banks in the global financial crisis and its sequels of massive trading losses, Libor fixing scandals and active tax evasion scheming as documented by Offshore Leaks are certainly not doing anything to improve the confidence customers get in the entities they are entrusting with their deposits.
But that relationship is also laden with paradox. Despite the apparent breakdown of trust in financial services brands, report after report from around the world show good satisfactions of customers in their banks.
Decent satisfaction… but appalling loyalty
According to the World Retail Banking Report by Capgemini, customer satisfaction has reached a respectable global average of 65% in 2012, with regions like North America leading at 80% and banks in Asia Pacific trailing at 53%. However, attempts at gauging loyalty of the same customers shows worrying results with only 50% of customers confident that they will remain with their primary bank over the next six months.
Customer Satisfaction with Primary Bank (%) by Region, 2012 – Source: 2012 Retail Banking Voice of the Customer Survey, Capgemini
Needless to say that customer loyalty in banking, as in any other industry, is of paramount importance, particularly in a time when banks desperately look to generate revenue. The lifetime value of loyal customers is significantly higher as they buy more banking products in support of the key events in their life. They also generally cost less to serve and naturally act as customer advocates.
Lack of trust… but likely acceptance as infomediary
The dreadful level of trust and confidence of consumers in the banking industry hides another paradox. When asked which party they would trust as a guardian of their personal digital information – or infomediary, guess who comes significantly ahead of social medial sites, telcos and even governments? Banks, of course. This is one of the interesting results of a recent report by Cisco IBSG, where banks were chosen by 42% of the respondents as the most qualified organisation they would be willing to use for a digital footprint management solution.
The optimistic way to look at these paradoxes is to believe that things can be fixed.
Increasing loyalty through financial advisory
In recent years, increased competition and fear of commoditisation (more than the image crisis of the banking industry) have been powerful drivers for banks to focus on customer satisfaction. Improvements such as extended branch opening hours or making sure that customers can accomplish a complete range of everyday banking activities online are laudable efforts. But they might not give banks that extra edge required to trigger a real increase in customer loyalty.
One obvious approach is for the banks to go the extra mile when customers face accidents of life, big (like losing a job) or small (like reverting a fraudulent transaction). Delighting customers upon those high-stakes moments, when the true meaning of “being here for you” is tested, is clearly key.
Building a long-term strategy of ongoing multi-channel assistance to customers might be a more powerful method though. Offering regular personal financial advice from experts who care, with no artificial gee-whiz factor, might be the best way to keep customer from switching. And the online banking service is a natural and cost-effective channel to deploy this value-add financial advisory.
And, beyond increased loyalty, what better way for banks to drum up some much needed customer trust and to improve public opinion than to fulfil their social role and responsibility as financial advisors?